WHAT THE GACHAGUA RULING ASKS OF KENYAN JURISPRUDENCE
By Tim Munyi Mugo | Advocate of the High Court of Kenya On 8 June 2026 a three-judge bench of the High Court did something Kenyan jurisprudence has not had to do before with this much clarity. It found that a constitutional right had been violated, and then declined to undo the act that violated it. The bench held that former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's right to a fair hearing was infringed when the Senate declined to grant an adjournment despite his absence from the impeachment proceedings. It then upheld the impeachment itself, finding that the broader process met constitutional thresholds. The remedy for the violation was not reinstatement. It was fifty million shillings in constitutional damages, and a declaration calling on Parliament to legislate a dedicated framework for impeaching a Deputy President. This is not a story about whether Gachagua should or should not have been removed. That question belongs to politics, to the Senate's numbers, and eventually to th...